For a lifelong Dodgers fan and third-generation Mexican American, the crowning highlight of the World Series didn't happen during the tense finale last Saturday, when her squad pulled off multiple dramatic comeback feat after another before prevailing in extra innings against the opposing team.
It happened a game earlier, when two supporting players, the Puerto Rican player and the Venezuelan infielder, executed a thrilling, game-winning play that simultaneously upended numerous negative misconceptions promoted about Hispanic people in the past decades.
The moment itself was breathtaking: the outfielder charged in from the outfield to catch a ball he initially misjudged in the stadium lights, then fired it to the infield to secure another, game-winning out. the second baseman, at second base, caught the ball moments before a opposing player barreled into him, knocking him backwards.
This wasn't merely a great athletic achievement, possibly the decisive shift in the series in the team's direction after appearing for much of the series like the underdog side. To her, it was thrilling, politically and culturally, a badly needed morale boost for Latinos and for the city after months of enforcement actions, security forces patrolling the neighborhoods, and a steady drumbeat of criticism from official sources.
"The players put forth this alternative story," said Molina. "Everyone witnessed Latinos showing an contagious enthusiasm in what they do, being leaders on the team, having a different kind of confidence. They're energetic, they're yelling, they're taking off their shirts."
"It was such a contrast with what we observe on the news – enforcement actions, Latinos thrown to the ground and pursued. It's so simple to be disheartened these days."
However, it's entirely straightforward to be a team fan these days – for her or for the many of other Latinos who attend faithfully to home games and occupy as many as 50% of the venue's fifty thousand seats each time.
After aggressive immigration raids began in the city in early June, and military units were deployed into the area to react to ensuing demonstrations, two of the city's soccer clubs promptly released statements of support with affected communities – while the baseball team.
The team president has said the organization prefer to steer clear of political issues – a stance colored, perhaps, by the reality that a significant portion of the supporters, including Latinos, are supporters of certain leaders. After considerable public pressure, the organization later committed $1m in aid for families personally impacted by the operations but issued no public criticism of the government.
Three months before, the team did not delay in agreeing to an offer to mark their previous World Series victory at the official residence – a decision that local writers described as "disappointing … spineless … and hypocritical", given the team's boast in having been the first major league franchise to break the racial segregation in the mid-20th century and the regular invocations of that history and the principles it represents by officials and present and former athletes. A number of players including the coach had voiced unwillingness to go to the event during the initial period but then changed their minds or succumbed to demands from team management.
An additional complication for fans is that the Dodgers are owned by a large investment group, the ownership group, whose investments, as per media reports and its own released balance sheets, involve a stake in a private prison company that operates detention centers. Guggenheim's leadership has said many times that it aims to remain neutral of political matters, but its critics say the inaction – and the investment – are their own form of acquiescence to certain policies.
These factors contribute to significant conflicted emotions among Hispanic supporters in particular – feelings that emerged even in the euphoria of this year's hard-fought World Series victory and the following explosion of Dodgers pride across Los Angeles.
"Is it okay to root for the team?" area writer one observer reflected at the beginning of the playoffs in an elegant article ruminating on "team loyalty in our veins, but uncertainty in our hearts". He was unable to ultimately bring himself to watch the World Series, but he still cared deeply, to the point that he believed his one-man protest must have given the squad the fortune it required to win.
Numerous fans who have Galindo's misgivings seem to have concluded that they can continue to support the players and its lineup of global stars, featuring the Japanese superstar Shohei Ohtani, while pouring scorn on the team's business overlords. Nowhere was this more clear than at the championship parade at Dodger Stadium on the following day, when the packed audience roared in approval of the coach and his players but booed the team president and the chief executive of the ownership group.
"The executives in formal attire don't get to take our boys in blue from us," the fan said. "We have been with the team for more time than they have."
The issue, though, runs deeper than just the organization's present owners. The deal that brought the former franchise to Los Angeles in the 1950s required the municipality razing three working-class Latino neighborhoods on a hill above downtown and then selling the property to the team for a small part of its actual worth. A song on a mid-2000s record that chronicles the events has an low-income worker at the venue revealing that the home he lost to removal is now third base.
Gustavo Arellano, perhaps southern California most influential Latino writer and media personality, sees a more troubling side to the long, problematic dynamic between the team and its fanbase. He calls the Dodgers the popular snack of baseball, "a corporate entity with an excessive, even unhealthy following by too many Latinos" that has been exploiting its fans for years.
"They've put one arm around Latino followers while picking their pockets with the other hand for so long because they have been able to get away with it," the writer wrote over the summer, when demands to avoid the organization over its absence of reaction to the enforcement actions were upended by the uncomfortable reality that attendance at home games remained steady, even at the height of the protests when the city center was under to a evening restriction.
Separating the squad from its corporate owners is not a simple task, {